The conventional wisdom is that high turnout favors Democrats, so this is probably bad news for Massa. If Hillary or Spitzer were in a tight race, they'd pour some of their massive warchests into a get-out-the-vote effort. As it stands, they can save their money for future campaigns.
The 29th has existed in its current form for two elections. In 2002, turnout was 174,631. In 2004, it was 270,215, a 55% increase. 2002 was probably the most "off" of off-years: the only major statewide race was a blowout for Pataki. So '02 is probably a low-water mark for turnout, representing the "solid core" of those who always vote. Amo Houghton took home a staggering 73.1% of the vote that year.
As the race progresses, I'll talk more about the turnout plans for 29th candidates. But it's never too soon to speculate about the national strategies of both parties.
Kuhl will probably use the same "72 Hour" strategy used by the Republicans to deliver Ohio in 2004. This Republican plan combines polling data, automated calls or emails, and personal visits to turn out the base. Assuming he's in close touch with the national campaign apparatus (I'm guessing he's joined at the hip), Randy's job will be to provide enough volunteers or paid workers to call and visit voters on election day.
Unfortunately for Massa, the Democratic turnout effort is looking like a casualty of disillusioned deep pockets and an internecine squabble between the Deaniacs and the Clintonites. For a party that can't reliably turnout the faithful, this seems like a bad time for the head of the Congressional Campaign Committee (Rahm Emmanuel) to stop speaking with the Party Chairman (Howard Dean).
Today, E.J. Dionne's column mentions a 40-most-contested district turnout program that Emmanual is financing. Even if the 29th is on that list, Massa probably won't be able to rely on as much help from the national party as Kuhl. He better start praying now for a sunny and warm November 7.
]]>The conventional wisdom is that high turnout favors Democrats, so this is probably bad news for Massa. If Hillary or Spitzer were in a tight race, they'd pour some of their massive warchests into a get-out-the-vote effort. As it stands, they can save their money for future campaigns.
The 29th has existed in its current form for two elections. In 2002, turnout was 174,631. In 2004, it was 270,215, a 55% increase. 2002 was probably the most "off" of off-years: the only major statewide race was a blowout for Pataki. So '02 is probably a low-water mark for turnout, representing the "solid core" of those who always vote. Amo Houghton took home a staggering 73.1% of the vote that year.
As the race progresses, I'll talk more about the turnout plans for 29th candidates. But it's never too soon to speculate about the national strategies of both parties.
Kuhl will probably use the same "72 Hour" strategy used by the Republicans to deliver Ohio in 2004. This Republican plan combines polling data, automated calls or emails, and personal visits to turn out the base. Assuming he's in close touch with the national campaign apparatus (I'm guessing he's joined at the hip), Randy's job will be to provide enough volunteers or paid workers to call and visit voters on election day.
Unfortunately for Massa, the Democratic turnout effort is looking like a casualty of disillusioned deep pockets and an internecine squabble between the Deaniacs and the Clintonites. For a party that can't reliably turnout the faithful, this seems like a bad time for the head of the Congressional Campaign Committee (Rahm Emmanuel) to stop speaking with the Party Chairman (Howard Dean).
Today, E.J. Dionne's column mentions a 40-most-contested district turnout program that Emmanual is financing. Even if the 29th is on that list, Massa probably won't be able to rely on as much help from the national party as Kuhl. He better start praying now for a sunny and warm November 7.
]]>