<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/tonights-debate.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4110/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4110/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2006-10-10T09:19:33-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Tonight&#039;s Debate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/tonights-debate.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/tonights-debate.html</id>
    <published>2006-10-10T09:19:33-04:00</published>
    <updated>2006-10-10T09:19:33-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="Debates" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Elmira and Corning papers are running debate preview stories this morning.&nbsp; Both are examples of the kind of lazy formulaic claptrap that passes for local political journalism.</p>
<p>The Star-Gazette <a href="http://www.stargazettenews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061010/NEWS01/610100324">story</a> is a &quot;man on the street&quot;, an amalgam of ill-informed quotes used to argue that voters really care about the economy and taxes, not war and terrorism.&nbsp; Never mind that the other Gannett paper in the 29th just published a <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/voice_of_the_vo.html">poll</a> where 82% said the war will play a major or minor role in their vote.&nbsp; &nbsp;I think I'll trust that poll over the feelings of the first five strangers some reporter bumped into an hour before deadline.&nbsp; Even though Elmira and Rochester are different, they're not 82% different. </p>
<p>The Corning Gazette <a href="http://www.the-leader.com/articles/2006/10/10/news/local02.txt">piece</a> is actually a little better, though it begins with a pure <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/tfp.html">TFP</a> line:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>U.S. Rep. John R. Kuhl Jr., and his Democratic challenger Eric Massa will likely trade barbs...</p></blockquote>
<p>Those fucking politicians - why must they always be trading nasty barbs?&nbsp; Can't they trade something less sharp and pointy, like baseball cards or beanie babies? </p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Elmira and Corning papers are running debate preview stories this morning.&nbsp; Both are examples of the kind of lazy formulaic claptrap that passes for local political journalism.</p>
<p>The Star-Gazette <a href="http://www.stargazettenews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061010/NEWS01/610100324">story</a> is a &quot;man on the street&quot;, an amalgam of ill-informed quotes used to argue that voters really care about the economy and taxes, not war and terrorism.&nbsp; Never mind that the other Gannett paper in the 29th just published a <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/voice_of_the_vo.html">poll</a> where 82% said the war will play a major or minor role in their vote.&nbsp; &nbsp;I think I'll trust that poll over the feelings of the first five strangers some reporter bumped into an hour before deadline.&nbsp; Even though Elmira and Rochester are different, they're not 82% different. </p>
<p>The Corning Gazette <a href="http://www.the-leader.com/articles/2006/10/10/news/local02.txt">piece</a> is actually a little better, though it begins with a pure <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/tfp.html">TFP</a> line:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>U.S. Rep. John R. Kuhl Jr., and his Democratic challenger Eric Massa will likely trade barbs...</p></blockquote>
<p>Those fucking politicians - why must they always be trading nasty barbs?&nbsp; Can't they trade something less sharp and pointy, like baseball cards or beanie babies? </p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
