<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/majority-watch-vs-other-pollsters.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4131/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4131/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2006-10-19T08:41:14-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Majority Watch vs Other Pollsters</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/majority-watch-vs-other-pollsters.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/majority-watch-vs-other-pollsters.html</id>
    <published>2006-10-19T08:41:14-04:00</published>
    <updated>2006-10-19T08:41:14-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="Polls" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Is Majority Watch full of crazy talk?&nbsp; That seems to be the theme of some postings here and on other blogs.&nbsp; While keeping in mind that old chestnut &quot;the only poll that matters is on election day&quot;, let's look how Majority Watch polls stack up in 8 9 other contested districts with multiple recent polls. </p>
     
            <p>It looks like there are three four districts where Majority Watch is in the ballpark: </p>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/il_06">IL-06</a>:&nbsp; MW calls it Duckworth (D) by 5.&nbsp; Other recent polls are tied or Duckworth by 5.</li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/mn_06">MN-06</a>:&nbsp; This is the Wetterling race, the mother of an abducted child who gave the Democrats' radio address on the first weekend of the Foley scandal.&nbsp; Polls taken early in the month show Bachmann (R) by 3.&nbsp; The MW poll taken on 10/12 shows Wetterling by 5.&nbsp; A newspaper poll taken 10/16 shows Wetterling by 8. </li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/nm_01">NM-01</a>:&nbsp; In this heavily polled race, both MW polls are squarely in the middle of the other polls.</li>

<li><a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/wa_08">WA-08</a>: MW is within a couple of points of a recent SurveyUSA poll, and both show Reichert (R) with a slim lead.</li></ul>
<p>Here are races that have only partisan comparison polling, but MW seems reasonable:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/ct_05">CT-05</a>:&nbsp; MW has Johnson (R) by 6.&nbsp; The other polls are all partisan, with the Republican poll showing the Republican by 10, and the Democratic poll showing the Democrat by 1 or by 5. </li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/fl_13">FL-13</a>:&nbsp; The Democratic poll has Jennings (D) up by 8 last month and 12 this month.&nbsp; MW has him up by 3 last week.</li></ul>
<p>Here are some districts where MW may be an outlier:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/co_07">CO-07</a>:&nbsp; MW has it as a tie.&nbsp; Other recent surveys have Perlmutter (D) up by 6 or 11.</li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/ny_20">NY-20</a>:&nbsp; Gillibrand's (D) own poll has her up by 1.&nbsp; MW's, taken two days later, has her up by 13.</li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/ny_26">NY-26</a>:&nbsp; MW's Davis (D) by 16 is the widest margin so far, even though Zogby's poll taken at about the same time has Davis by 15. </li></ul>
<p>Other than NY-20, I don't see a poll where Majority Watch looks way out of sync with the rest of the professional pollsters.&nbsp; But, as with the first poll in this post, I recommend that all readers who are interested in polls read the <a href="http://www.pollster.com/mystery_pollster/handicapping_the_house_part_i.php">excellent</a> <a href="http://www.pollster.com/mystery_pollster/handicapping_the_house_part_ii.php">analysis</a> at pollster.com, which makes it clear that polling in House races is far less accurate than Presidential race polling.</p>

<p>(Update:&nbsp; Forgot WA-08)</p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Is Majority Watch full of crazy talk?&nbsp; That seems to be the theme of some postings here and on other blogs.&nbsp; While keeping in mind that old chestnut &quot;the only poll that matters is on election day&quot;, let's look how Majority Watch polls stack up in 8 9 other contested districts with multiple recent polls. </p>
     
            <p>It looks like there are three four districts where Majority Watch is in the ballpark: </p>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/il_06">IL-06</a>:&nbsp; MW calls it Duckworth (D) by 5.&nbsp; Other recent polls are tied or Duckworth by 5.</li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/mn_06">MN-06</a>:&nbsp; This is the Wetterling race, the mother of an abducted child who gave the Democrats' radio address on the first weekend of the Foley scandal.&nbsp; Polls taken early in the month show Bachmann (R) by 3.&nbsp; The MW poll taken on 10/12 shows Wetterling by 5.&nbsp; A newspaper poll taken 10/16 shows Wetterling by 8. </li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/nm_01">NM-01</a>:&nbsp; In this heavily polled race, both MW polls are squarely in the middle of the other polls.</li>

<li><a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/wa_08">WA-08</a>: MW is within a couple of points of a recent SurveyUSA poll, and both show Reichert (R) with a slim lead.</li></ul>
<p>Here are races that have only partisan comparison polling, but MW seems reasonable:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/ct_05">CT-05</a>:&nbsp; MW has Johnson (R) by 6.&nbsp; The other polls are all partisan, with the Republican poll showing the Republican by 10, and the Democratic poll showing the Democrat by 1 or by 5. </li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/fl_13">FL-13</a>:&nbsp; The Democratic poll has Jennings (D) up by 8 last month and 12 this month.&nbsp; MW has him up by 3 last week.</li></ul>
<p>Here are some districts where MW may be an outlier:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/co_07">CO-07</a>:&nbsp; MW has it as a tie.&nbsp; Other recent surveys have Perlmutter (D) up by 6 or 11.</li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/ny_20">NY-20</a>:&nbsp; Gillibrand's (D) own poll has her up by 1.&nbsp; MW's, taken two days later, has her up by 13.</li>
<li>
<a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/election_tags/ny_26">NY-26</a>:&nbsp; MW's Davis (D) by 16 is the widest margin so far, even though Zogby's poll taken at about the same time has Davis by 15. </li></ul>
<p>Other than NY-20, I don't see a poll where Majority Watch looks way out of sync with the rest of the professional pollsters.&nbsp; But, as with the first poll in this post, I recommend that all readers who are interested in polls read the <a href="http://www.pollster.com/mystery_pollster/handicapping_the_house_part_i.php">excellent</a> <a href="http://www.pollster.com/mystery_pollster/handicapping_the_house_part_ii.php">analysis</a> at pollster.com, which makes it clear that polling in House races is far less accurate than Presidential race polling.</p>

<p>(Update:&nbsp; Forgot WA-08)</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
