<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/more-majority-w.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4132/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4132/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2006-10-19T11:56:06-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>More Majority Watch Skepticism</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/more-majority-w.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2006/10/more-majority-w.html</id>
    <published>2006-10-19T11:56:06-04:00</published>
    <updated>2006-10-19T11:56:06-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Polls" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As noted in this morning's earlier post, NY-20 was the major outlier in the races where other polls could be compared to Majority Watch's work.&nbsp; Today's <a href="http://blogs.timesunion.com/capitol/?p=2474">Siena Poll</a> in that race adds more reason for skepticism.&nbsp; It shows Gillibrand trailing Sweeney by 14 points.&nbsp; The Majority Watch poll, taken around the same time, shows her ahead by 13, a 27-point spread.</p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As noted in this morning's earlier post, NY-20 was the major outlier in the races where other polls could be compared to Majority Watch's work.&nbsp; Today's <a href="http://blogs.timesunion.com/capitol/?p=2474">Siena Poll</a> in that race adds more reason for skepticism.&nbsp; It shows Gillibrand trailing Sweeney by 14 points.&nbsp; The Majority Watch poll, taken around the same time, shows her ahead by 13, a 27-point spread.</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
