<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/01/debate-naah.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4642/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4642/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-01-28T11:51:30-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate?  Naah.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/01/debate-naah.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/01/debate-naah.html</id>
    <published>2008-01-28T11:51:30-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-28T11:51:30-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="Media" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Last week the Massa campaign put out a press release essentially challenging Randy Kuhl to a debate.&nbsp; The heading of the release was "Massa Accepts Kuhl's Challenge to Debate".&nbsp; I read the release, and also the press release from the Kuhl campaign, which I got via the Massa campaign.&nbsp; After looking both over, I decided that it was basically an attempt by the Massa campaign to get some attention based on some pretty light evidence, and didn't run the story.&nbsp; <br /><br />Today, the Ontario Republican <a href="http://ontariogop.blogspot.com/2008/01/kuhl-in-news.html">posted a link</a> to a Messenger-Post is report that Eric Massa and Randy Kuhl are <a href="http://www.mpnnow.com/news/x254754433">planning a debate</a> on S-CHIP, perhaps sometime in March.&nbsp; The story was by Hillary Smith, one of their general assignment reporters.&nbsp; Ontario GOP quickly posted a f<a href="http://ontariogop.blogspot.com/2008/01/congressman-kuhls-press-release-on.html">ollow-up denial</a>, which I assume he got from Kuhl's office, that includes the entire Kuhl press release.&nbsp; GOP says that he thought the story was a little fishy, but he went with it anyway because the M-P printed it.<br /><br />If this tells us anything about politics and journalism, it's this:&nbsp; newspapers need to feed the beast.&nbsp; That's why campaigns send out press releases like a deer craps pellets. Once in a while, a campaign lucks out and their pure spin gets reported as fact.&nbsp;&nbsp; I'd bet a little money that Hillary Smith did not call Kuhl's office on this one, because she'd have gotten a pretty quick denial.&nbsp; I'll further speculate that Hillary's editor will get an earful from the Kuhl press office, and M-P reporters will be a little more careful in the future.<br /><br />As far as I've seen, the M-P was the only local paper that ran the Massa press release.&nbsp; The other left-leaning blog in the area, Rochesterturning, <a href="http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/24/massa-to-debate-kuhl-on-schip/">has a post on it,</a> but later included an update saying that it might just be a media back-and-forth instead of a real debate.&nbsp; So even the "partisan" bloggers didn't swallow it whole.&nbsp; Take from that what you will.<br />    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[Last week the Massa campaign put out a press release essentially challenging Randy Kuhl to a debate.&nbsp; The heading of the release was "Massa Accepts Kuhl's Challenge to Debate".&nbsp; I read the release, and also the press release from the Kuhl campaign, which I got via the Massa campaign.&nbsp; After looking both over, I decided that it was basically an attempt by the Massa campaign to get some attention based on some pretty light evidence, and didn't run the story.&nbsp; <br /><br />Today, the Ontario Republican <a href="http://ontariogop.blogspot.com/2008/01/kuhl-in-news.html">posted a link</a> to a Messenger-Post is report that Eric Massa and Randy Kuhl are <a href="http://www.mpnnow.com/news/x254754433">planning a debate</a> on S-CHIP, perhaps sometime in March.&nbsp; The story was by Hillary Smith, one of their general assignment reporters.&nbsp; Ontario GOP quickly posted a f<a href="http://ontariogop.blogspot.com/2008/01/congressman-kuhls-press-release-on.html">ollow-up denial</a>, which I assume he got from Kuhl's office, that includes the entire Kuhl press release.&nbsp; GOP says that he thought the story was a little fishy, but he went with it anyway because the M-P printed it.<br /><br />If this tells us anything about politics and journalism, it's this:&nbsp; newspapers need to feed the beast.&nbsp; That's why campaigns send out press releases like a deer craps pellets. Once in a while, a campaign lucks out and their pure spin gets reported as fact.&nbsp;&nbsp; I'd bet a little money that Hillary Smith did not call Kuhl's office on this one, because she'd have gotten a pretty quick denial.&nbsp; I'll further speculate that Hillary's editor will get an earful from the Kuhl press office, and M-P reporters will be a little more careful in the future.<br /><br />As far as I've seen, the M-P was the only local paper that ran the Massa press release.&nbsp; The other left-leaning blog in the area, Rochesterturning, <a href="http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/24/massa-to-debate-kuhl-on-schip/">has a post on it,</a> but later included an update saying that it might just be a media back-and-forth instead of a real debate.&nbsp; So even the "partisan" bloggers didn't swallow it whole.&nbsp; Take from that what you will.<br />    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
