<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/02/shoot-the-messenger.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4657/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4657/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-02-05T20:06:24-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Shoot the Messenger</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/02/shoot-the-messenger.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/02/shoot-the-messenger.html</id>
    <published>2008-02-05T20:06:24-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-05T20:06:24-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="News" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The WHAM-13 blog has a <a href="http://www.13wham.com/content/news/political/story.aspx?content_id=8f91b336-e8ae-4eff-8916-1922ead1a508">new post</a> with more details on Randy Kuhl's trip to Brazil.&nbsp; Kuhl's office has released a partial accounting of the cost of his trip, which totals around $4K.&nbsp; As WHAM's Evan Dawson points out, that number is misleading because it doesn't include the cost of military air transport, which is something like $10,000 per hour.<br /><br />In addition to the cost of military airtime, there's some more missing information:&nbsp; how many military and/or embassy personnel were detailed to the trip?&nbsp; How much time did that expensive airplane and crew have to sit around waiting to shuttle the delegation between cities?&nbsp; All the disclosure appears to show is Kuhl's per diem and hotel costs, which is a small fraction of the cost to taxpayers.<br /><br />This partial information release is accompanied by one of the snottiest press releases I've read in a long time.&nbsp; Here's an excerpt:<br /><br />

<blockquote>The
total for my portion of the trip was $4,028.93, which divided up
among the 600,000+ residents the 29th District, equals approximately
$0.00671 per constituent. </blockquote><p>
</p>
<blockquote>I
understand the significance $0.00671 means to my district, but
achieving energy independence is priceless to some. There are those
who said that this trip was a vacation and we should have spent our
time in Iowa. When Iowa finds the solution to energy independence, I
will be the first to schedule a CODEL there.</blockquote>
<blockquote>It 
is unfortunate that some media outlets and individuals would skew
this trip to only be about dollars and cents. But the truth is that
this trip was desperately needed by lawmakers of Congress to find a
solution to the energy crisis and I encourage more of my colleagues
in Congress to visit Brazil. </blockquote><p>
</p>
 Kuhl seems to be attacking the messenger, WHAM, which is an organization that's just doing its job.&nbsp; When you don't disclose information when you promise to do so, it makes good reporters curious, so they follow up.&nbsp; WHAM spent an inordinate amount of time and effort to find out something that could have been disclosed on time and without any static.&nbsp; Their reward for going through weeks of run-around is a partial disclosure and a bunch of attitude.&nbsp; They're the ones who should be snarky, but of course they've stayed professional.<br /><br />If there's really nothing here, then Kuhl should put a little foot on ass with the committee bureaucracy and provide a full disclosure.&nbsp; That's good representation and smart politics. <br /><br />(Thanks to Exile at <a href="http://rochesterturning.com/2008/02/05/kuhl-releases-documentssort-of/">Rochesterturning</a> for a heads-up on this.)<br />    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[The WHAM-13 blog has a <a href="http://www.13wham.com/content/news/political/story.aspx?content_id=8f91b336-e8ae-4eff-8916-1922ead1a508">new post</a> with more details on Randy Kuhl's trip to Brazil.&nbsp; Kuhl's office has released a partial accounting of the cost of his trip, which totals around $4K.&nbsp; As WHAM's Evan Dawson points out, that number is misleading because it doesn't include the cost of military air transport, which is something like $10,000 per hour.<br /><br />In addition to the cost of military airtime, there's some more missing information:&nbsp; how many military and/or embassy personnel were detailed to the trip?&nbsp; How much time did that expensive airplane and crew have to sit around waiting to shuttle the delegation between cities?&nbsp; All the disclosure appears to show is Kuhl's per diem and hotel costs, which is a small fraction of the cost to taxpayers.<br /><br />This partial information release is accompanied by one of the snottiest press releases I've read in a long time.&nbsp; Here's an excerpt:<br /><br />

<blockquote>The
total for my portion of the trip was $4,028.93, which divided up
among the 600,000+ residents the 29th District, equals approximately
$0.00671 per constituent. </blockquote><p>
</p>
<blockquote>I
understand the significance $0.00671 means to my district, but
achieving energy independence is priceless to some. There are those
who said that this trip was a vacation and we should have spent our
time in Iowa. When Iowa finds the solution to energy independence, I
will be the first to schedule a CODEL there.</blockquote>
<blockquote>It 
is unfortunate that some media outlets and individuals would skew
this trip to only be about dollars and cents. But the truth is that
this trip was desperately needed by lawmakers of Congress to find a
solution to the energy crisis and I encourage more of my colleagues
in Congress to visit Brazil. </blockquote><p>
</p>
 Kuhl seems to be attacking the messenger, WHAM, which is an organization that's just doing its job.&nbsp; When you don't disclose information when you promise to do so, it makes good reporters curious, so they follow up.&nbsp; WHAM spent an inordinate amount of time and effort to find out something that could have been disclosed on time and without any static.&nbsp; Their reward for going through weeks of run-around is a partial disclosure and a bunch of attitude.&nbsp; They're the ones who should be snarky, but of course they've stayed professional.<br /><br />If there's really nothing here, then Kuhl should put a little foot on ass with the committee bureaucracy and provide a full disclosure.&nbsp; That's good representation and smart politics. <br /><br />(Thanks to Exile at <a href="http://rochesterturning.com/2008/02/05/kuhl-releases-documentssort-of/">Rochesterturning</a> for a heads-up on this.)<br />    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
