<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/02/thought-experiment.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4658/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4658/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-02-06T08:03:39-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Thought Experiment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/02/thought-experiment.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/02/thought-experiment.html</id>
    <published>2008-02-06T08:03:39-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-06T08:03:39-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Media" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Ontario GOP has a couple of comments in<a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/02/shoot-the-messenger.html"> last night's post</a>, alleging media bias in the 29th district.&nbsp; I invite anyone who thinks that might be true to engage in the following mental experiment:<br /><br />Imagine that your least-favorite Congressional Democrat (Louise Slaughter, Brian Higgins, whoever) went on a Congressional junket somewhere you think he or she has no business going.&nbsp;  <br /><br />When you're looking through the media coverage of that trip, which would you prefer:<br /><br /><ol><li>A series of stories that examine every detail of the trip, questioning the stated purpose, and showing that your least-favorite Democrat was giving the press the run-around, and that his or her expense report probably understated the real cost of the trip.</li><br /><li>A story that re-prints Brian or Louise's press release about the trip without questioning it.<br /></li><br /><li>A local press that completely ignores the trip, because the trip wasn't a lot of money and there are more important things to discuss.</li></ol>I want (1).&nbsp; While I don't agree with (3) completely, I understand that the press sometimes tends to focus on minutiae while ignoring the big picture.&nbsp; What I don't get is (2), which is apparently what some Kuhl supporters expect from the local press.<br />    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[Ontario GOP has a couple of comments in<a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/02/shoot-the-messenger.html"> last night's post</a>, alleging media bias in the 29th district.&nbsp; I invite anyone who thinks that might be true to engage in the following mental experiment:<br /><br />Imagine that your least-favorite Congressional Democrat (Louise Slaughter, Brian Higgins, whoever) went on a Congressional junket somewhere you think he or she has no business going.&nbsp;  <br /><br />When you're looking through the media coverage of that trip, which would you prefer:<br /><br /><ol><li>A series of stories that examine every detail of the trip, questioning the stated purpose, and showing that your least-favorite Democrat was giving the press the run-around, and that his or her expense report probably understated the real cost of the trip.</li><br /><li>A story that re-prints Brian or Louise's press release about the trip without questioning it.<br /></li><br /><li>A local press that completely ignores the trip, because the trip wasn't a lot of money and there are more important things to discuss.</li></ol>I want (1).&nbsp; While I don't agree with (3) completely, I understand that the press sometimes tends to focus on minutiae while ignoring the big picture.&nbsp; What I don't get is (2), which is apparently what some Kuhl supporters expect from the local press.<br />    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
