<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/03/blogversation-1.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4682/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4682/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-03-03T13:09:15-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Blogversation 1</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/03/blogversation-1.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/03/blogversation-1.html</id>
    <published>2008-03-03T13:09:15-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-03T13:09:15-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Blogversation" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Evan Dawson of 13 WHAM has asked a few area bloggers to join in a "blogversation".&nbsp; Evan blogs at the <a href="http://www.13wham.com/content/blogs/default.aspx">13WHAM blog</a>.&nbsp; Other participants are Exile at <a href="http://rochesterturning.com/">Rochesterturning</a>, and <a href="http://ontariogop.blogspot.com/">Ontario GOP</a>.&nbsp; To get the ball rolling, Evan has asked the question:&nbsp; "Do you consider yourselves journalists?"<br /><br />There are three things that I do here, only one of which is "journalism" in the old-school sense of the term.<br /><br />The first, and probably most prevalent, is aggregation, which is a fancy word for linking to things on the Internet and elsewhere that are relevant to the 29th district.&nbsp; This includes news stories, You Tube videos, and items sent by readers.&nbsp; In this respect, I'm lucky to have a core group of smart, connected readers who send me news stories and other items that I might otherwise overlook.&nbsp; As an aggregator, I don't edit much.&nbsp; If the item is about Randy Kuhl, Eric Massa or the 29th district, and it's factual, it will probably make the blog.&nbsp;&nbsp; I use the category capabilities of my blog software to label these posts as things like "News", "Video", "Votes" or "Money".<br /><br />The second is analysis, which is trying to interpret what's been said in the local media and on the Internet.&nbsp; These posts are generally labeled "analysis" or "speculation", and they contain my opinions.&nbsp; Sometimes I aggregate and comment at the same time, but generally I try to keep these separate.&nbsp; I would like my blog to be a useful resource for anyone interested in the 29th district, even if they don't share my politics, so I try to treat the news and my reaction to it as separate items.<br /><br />Third, I do some original reporting.&nbsp; As someone who has a day job, I'm limited in what I can cover.&nbsp; For example, when Eric Massa invited me to his weekly press conferences, I started covering them.&nbsp; This is a lot of work, and I find now that I can only attend a couple per month.&nbsp; Last year, I also began keeping track of earmarks and "significant votes" in the 29th, creating a new site, <a href="http://congressdb.com/">congressdb,</a> to track voting.&nbsp; When Congress chose to combine most of its appropriations for the year into one omnibus budget bill, it kind of made a mockery of the careful earmark and vote tracking that I had been doing.&nbsp; After I get over my frustration about that, I plan to re-vamp this portion of the site and continue that work in the next month or so.&nbsp; <br /><br />I think bloggers will ultimately be the go-to source for reporting that analyzes and interprets data freely available on the Internet.&nbsp; This is due to a number of factors:&nbsp; bloggers are often more technically savvy that the average reporter, mining Internet data can occur during off-hours, and a blogger can become a specialist in certain categories of data, while most reporters don't have the luxury of concentrating their attention on one narrow topic.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; That's why I'm so interested in government transparency.&nbsp; The more information that the government has to report on the Internet, the more that bloggers like me can comb through it to find news.&nbsp; <br /><br />So, I'm not a journalist in the traditional sense of the word, or even in the <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/">Josh Marshall</a> sense of the word, but I do some journalism.&nbsp; <br />    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[Evan Dawson of 13 WHAM has asked a few area bloggers to join in a "blogversation".&nbsp; Evan blogs at the <a href="http://www.13wham.com/content/blogs/default.aspx">13WHAM blog</a>.&nbsp; Other participants are Exile at <a href="http://rochesterturning.com/">Rochesterturning</a>, and <a href="http://ontariogop.blogspot.com/">Ontario GOP</a>.&nbsp; To get the ball rolling, Evan has asked the question:&nbsp; "Do you consider yourselves journalists?"<br /><br />There are three things that I do here, only one of which is "journalism" in the old-school sense of the term.<br /><br />The first, and probably most prevalent, is aggregation, which is a fancy word for linking to things on the Internet and elsewhere that are relevant to the 29th district.&nbsp; This includes news stories, You Tube videos, and items sent by readers.&nbsp; In this respect, I'm lucky to have a core group of smart, connected readers who send me news stories and other items that I might otherwise overlook.&nbsp; As an aggregator, I don't edit much.&nbsp; If the item is about Randy Kuhl, Eric Massa or the 29th district, and it's factual, it will probably make the blog.&nbsp;&nbsp; I use the category capabilities of my blog software to label these posts as things like "News", "Video", "Votes" or "Money".<br /><br />The second is analysis, which is trying to interpret what's been said in the local media and on the Internet.&nbsp; These posts are generally labeled "analysis" or "speculation", and they contain my opinions.&nbsp; Sometimes I aggregate and comment at the same time, but generally I try to keep these separate.&nbsp; I would like my blog to be a useful resource for anyone interested in the 29th district, even if they don't share my politics, so I try to treat the news and my reaction to it as separate items.<br /><br />Third, I do some original reporting.&nbsp; As someone who has a day job, I'm limited in what I can cover.&nbsp; For example, when Eric Massa invited me to his weekly press conferences, I started covering them.&nbsp; This is a lot of work, and I find now that I can only attend a couple per month.&nbsp; Last year, I also began keeping track of earmarks and "significant votes" in the 29th, creating a new site, <a href="http://congressdb.com/">congressdb,</a> to track voting.&nbsp; When Congress chose to combine most of its appropriations for the year into one omnibus budget bill, it kind of made a mockery of the careful earmark and vote tracking that I had been doing.&nbsp; After I get over my frustration about that, I plan to re-vamp this portion of the site and continue that work in the next month or so.&nbsp; <br /><br />I think bloggers will ultimately be the go-to source for reporting that analyzes and interprets data freely available on the Internet.&nbsp; This is due to a number of factors:&nbsp; bloggers are often more technically savvy that the average reporter, mining Internet data can occur during off-hours, and a blogger can become a specialist in certain categories of data, while most reporters don't have the luxury of concentrating their attention on one narrow topic.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; That's why I'm so interested in government transparency.&nbsp; The more information that the government has to report on the Internet, the more that bloggers like me can comb through it to find news.&nbsp; <br /><br />So, I'm not a journalist in the traditional sense of the word, or even in the <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/">Josh Marshall</a> sense of the word, but I do some journalism.&nbsp; <br />    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
