<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/03/the-favor-factory.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4694/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4694/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-03-10T08:46:23-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>The Favor Factory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/03/the-favor-factory.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/03/the-favor-factory.html</id>
    <published>2008-03-10T08:46:23-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-10T08:46:23-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Earmarks" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Seattle Times has done a deep dive into earmarking.&nbsp; First, they went through a huge, mainly manual effort to compile a database of Defense earmarks and campaign contributors who get earmarks.&nbsp; Then, they researched some of those earmarks, and found some incredible, yet typical wastes of money.<br /><br />For example, one earmark by Sen. Patti Murray (D-WA) for a heads-up display used by Army troops was for a device that had lost an Army bid.&nbsp; Most of those devices are stored in a warehouse and will never be used.&nbsp; Another of her earmarks was for a patrol boat the Navy and Coast Guard didn't want, and that they gave away almost immediately after it was received. <br /><br />Rep. David Wu (D-OR-1) got an earmark for a local clothing manufacturer for T-shirts for the Marine Corps.&nbsp; The shirts are synthetic fabric which burns and melts easily, and are banned in combat.&nbsp; <br /><br />The Times' was able to correlate all of Murray and Wu's earmarks with significant campaign contributions from officials for the earmark recipients' companies.&nbsp; Their database covers all of Congress, including <a href="http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/favorfactory/lawmaker.php?id=H4NY29080">Randy Kuhl</a>.<br /><br />The Times' effort to compile this database and track down worthless earmarks was documented in a <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/expose/2008/02/301-index.html">recent episode</a> of Bill Moyers Journal, which can be viewed online.&nbsp; If you have any interest in journalism or earmarking, take 20 minutes and watch it online -- it's well worth the effort.&nbsp; Also worth a read is the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/expose/2008/02/favors-in-fine-print.html">summary story</a> by the main Times' reporter, David Heath.<br />    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[The Seattle Times has done a deep dive into earmarking.&nbsp; First, they went through a huge, mainly manual effort to compile a database of Defense earmarks and campaign contributors who get earmarks.&nbsp; Then, they researched some of those earmarks, and found some incredible, yet typical wastes of money.<br /><br />For example, one earmark by Sen. Patti Murray (D-WA) for a heads-up display used by Army troops was for a device that had lost an Army bid.&nbsp; Most of those devices are stored in a warehouse and will never be used.&nbsp; Another of her earmarks was for a patrol boat the Navy and Coast Guard didn't want, and that they gave away almost immediately after it was received. <br /><br />Rep. David Wu (D-OR-1) got an earmark for a local clothing manufacturer for T-shirts for the Marine Corps.&nbsp; The shirts are synthetic fabric which burns and melts easily, and are banned in combat.&nbsp; <br /><br />The Times' was able to correlate all of Murray and Wu's earmarks with significant campaign contributions from officials for the earmark recipients' companies.&nbsp; Their database covers all of Congress, including <a href="http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/favorfactory/lawmaker.php?id=H4NY29080">Randy Kuhl</a>.<br /><br />The Times' effort to compile this database and track down worthless earmarks was documented in a <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/expose/2008/02/301-index.html">recent episode</a> of Bill Moyers Journal, which can be viewed online.&nbsp; If you have any interest in journalism or earmarking, take 20 minutes and watch it online -- it's well worth the effort.&nbsp; Also worth a read is the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/expose/2008/02/favors-in-fine-print.html">summary story</a> by the main Times' reporter, David Heath.<br />    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
