<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/03/kuhl-and-the-moderate-label.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4723/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4723/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-03-31T07:40:53-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Kuhl and the &quot;Moderate&quot; Label</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/03/kuhl-and-the-moderate-label.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/03/kuhl-and-the-moderate-label.html</id>
    <published>2008-03-31T07:40:53-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-31T07:40:53-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="News" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Watertown Daily Times has a <a href="http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20080331/NEWS02/59124623">long story</a> about Randy Kuhl and the demise of moderate Republicans.&nbsp; As the article points out, Kuhl is only "moderate" in comparison to the current crop of Republicans:&nbsp; "with the ranks of so-called moderate Republicans in Congress thinning,
Mr. Kuhl, who supports organized labor and lower taxes, is looking a
lot more middle-of-the-road."<br /><br />The story doesn't point out that Kuhl's labor support is mixed at best.&nbsp; For example, he voted against the Employee Free Choice Act, which was the "big" labor bill last year.&nbsp; But the general point of the article, which is that Republican moderates and the groups that support them are languishing, is absolutely correct.&nbsp; Some of those groups have been diminished to almost nothing:<br /><br /><blockquote>The Log Cabin Republicans PAC, which supports candidates supportive of
gay and lesbian issues, has contributed just $1,000 to candidates so
far this cycle, after giving $31,144 to 11 House candidates and one
Senate candidate in 2006.<br /></blockquote>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[The Watertown Daily Times has a <a href="http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20080331/NEWS02/59124623">long story</a> about Randy Kuhl and the demise of moderate Republicans.&nbsp; As the article points out, Kuhl is only "moderate" in comparison to the current crop of Republicans:&nbsp; "with the ranks of so-called moderate Republicans in Congress thinning,
Mr. Kuhl, who supports organized labor and lower taxes, is looking a
lot more middle-of-the-road."<br /><br />The story doesn't point out that Kuhl's labor support is mixed at best.&nbsp; For example, he voted against the Employee Free Choice Act, which was the "big" labor bill last year.&nbsp; But the general point of the article, which is that Republican moderates and the groups that support them are languishing, is absolutely correct.&nbsp; Some of those groups have been diminished to almost nothing:<br /><br /><blockquote>The Log Cabin Republicans PAC, which supports candidates supportive of
gay and lesbian issues, has contributed just $1,000 to candidates so
far this cycle, after giving $31,144 to 11 House candidates and one
Senate candidate in 2006.<br /></blockquote>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
