<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/the-pig-book.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4729/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4729/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-04-04T08:39:51-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>The Pig Book</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/the-pig-book.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/the-pig-book.html</id>
    <published>2008-04-04T08:39:51-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-04T08:39:51-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="Earmarks" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[WETM-TV's <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/todays-media-cycle.html">story</a> about Randy Kuhl's earmark for Elmira College got me wondering just what criteria Citizens Against Government Waste used to call out appropriations as pork.&nbsp; According to <a href="http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=reports_pigbook2007">their site</a>, the appropriation will end up in their "Pig Book" if it passes one or more of the following tests:<br /><br /> 

<ul>
<li>Requested by only one chamber of Congress;</li>
<li>Not specifically authorized;</li>
<li>Not competitively awarded;</li>
<li>Not requested by the President;</li>
<li>Greatly exceeds the President’s budget request or the previous year’s funding;</li>
<li>Not the subject of congressional hearings; or</li>
<li>Serves only a local or special interest.</li>
</ul>In other words, almost every earmark makes the Pig Book.&nbsp; On their <a href="http://www.cagw.org/site/DocServer/House_-_alpha.pdf?docID=3021">summary list [pdf]</a>, Randy Kuhl has $23.5 million of spend that qualifies, which ranks him 186th in Congress.&nbsp; Number One is now-Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss), followed by Bill Young (R-FL-10) and John Murtha (D-PA-12).<br />    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[WETM-TV's <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/todays-media-cycle.html">story</a> about Randy Kuhl's earmark for Elmira College got me wondering just what criteria Citizens Against Government Waste used to call out appropriations as pork.&nbsp; According to <a href="http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=reports_pigbook2007">their site</a>, the appropriation will end up in their "Pig Book" if it passes one or more of the following tests:<br /><br /> 

<ul>
<li>Requested by only one chamber of Congress;</li>
<li>Not specifically authorized;</li>
<li>Not competitively awarded;</li>
<li>Not requested by the President;</li>
<li>Greatly exceeds the President’s budget request or the previous year’s funding;</li>
<li>Not the subject of congressional hearings; or</li>
<li>Serves only a local or special interest.</li>
</ul>In other words, almost every earmark makes the Pig Book.&nbsp; On their <a href="http://www.cagw.org/site/DocServer/House_-_alpha.pdf?docID=3021">summary list [pdf]</a>, Randy Kuhl has $23.5 million of spend that qualifies, which ranks him 186th in Congress.&nbsp; Number One is now-Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss), followed by Bill Young (R-FL-10) and John Murtha (D-PA-12).<br />    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
