<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/kuhl-meeting-report.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4730/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4730/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-04-04T21:34:10-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Kuhl Meeting Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/kuhl-meeting-report.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/kuhl-meeting-report.html</id>
    <published>2008-04-04T21:34:10-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-04T21:34:10-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="News" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[A reader was granted an audience with&nbsp; Randy Kuhl at a recent town hall meeting.&nbsp; Here are some excerpts from his report:<br /><br /><blockquote>I brought my 3 mailers. You had to sign in with the watchdogs and they
escorted you back to a conference room where he was sitting. I asked
him about NCLB, the tax rebate and why he sends out the mailers. I
didn't bring a recorder, so I can't give you any direct quotes, which
was the whole point of the format as anyone could see.<br /></blockquote><blockquote>The wait was between 25 and 35 minutes. I
didn't see him until 10 mins. after he was supposed to leave and he
spoke to me for 20 full minutes. At 10 - 15 minutes a piece, he saw
less than 10 people including me.<br /></blockquote><blockquote>Kuhl was actually well spoken. I was obviously not a supporter, but
he was able to talk a good game. Very slick, he blinded me a little
with bullshit.<br /></blockquote><blockquote>Somehow we got onto the format of these
one-on-one meetings and he got a little red-faced about how others
might not let me speak and would be shouting me down if this was a
regular open format. I wasn't quick enough to say something to the
effect of it is their right to freedom of speech and that I'd rather
that sort of thing not be limited. I also should have asked what he
would have done if there were 5 or 10 more people out there waiting
their turn to speak to him and they couldn't.<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote>NCLB: he said there needs to be changes. He wasn't specific.<br /></blockquote><blockquote>Taxes:
Some of the money is going to help small businesses. Basic supply-side
economics stuff. I told him I was going to put it into a savings
account and not spend it, and he didn't disagree with me.<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote>Mailers: Basic "I need to get information out to people who might
not hear about it" answer. Seniors for example might not have heard
about some of the regulations with the rebates.. <br /></blockquote>Thanks for the report.&nbsp; Anyone else who attended is welcome to send their view for publication or background.<br />    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[A reader was granted an audience with&nbsp; Randy Kuhl at a recent town hall meeting.&nbsp; Here are some excerpts from his report:<br /><br /><blockquote>I brought my 3 mailers. You had to sign in with the watchdogs and they
escorted you back to a conference room where he was sitting. I asked
him about NCLB, the tax rebate and why he sends out the mailers. I
didn't bring a recorder, so I can't give you any direct quotes, which
was the whole point of the format as anyone could see.<br /></blockquote><blockquote>The wait was between 25 and 35 minutes. I
didn't see him until 10 mins. after he was supposed to leave and he
spoke to me for 20 full minutes. At 10 - 15 minutes a piece, he saw
less than 10 people including me.<br /></blockquote><blockquote>Kuhl was actually well spoken. I was obviously not a supporter, but
he was able to talk a good game. Very slick, he blinded me a little
with bullshit.<br /></blockquote><blockquote>Somehow we got onto the format of these
one-on-one meetings and he got a little red-faced about how others
might not let me speak and would be shouting me down if this was a
regular open format. I wasn't quick enough to say something to the
effect of it is their right to freedom of speech and that I'd rather
that sort of thing not be limited. I also should have asked what he
would have done if there were 5 or 10 more people out there waiting
their turn to speak to him and they couldn't.<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote>NCLB: he said there needs to be changes. He wasn't specific.<br /></blockquote><blockquote>Taxes:
Some of the money is going to help small businesses. Basic supply-side
economics stuff. I told him I was going to put it into a savings
account and not spend it, and he didn't disagree with me.<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote>Mailers: Basic "I need to get information out to people who might
not hear about it" answer. Seniors for example might not have heard
about some of the regulations with the rebates.. <br /></blockquote>Thanks for the report.&nbsp; Anyone else who attended is welcome to send their view for publication or background.<br />    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
