<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/debates-and-money.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4745/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4745/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-04-17T09:54:48-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Debates and Money</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/debates-and-money.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/debates-and-money.html</id>
    <published>2008-04-17T09:54:48-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-17T09:54:48-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Messenger-Post's <a href="http://www.mpnnow.com/opinions/x1319853249">latest editorial</a> says that the "ball is in Kuhl's court" on debates between the two candidates.&nbsp; Kuhl's reasons for waiting to schedule debates are his need to gather petition signatures and the possibility of having a primary opponent. <br /><br />The real reason, which is true in almost every campaign, is that the incumbent has more to lose than the challenger in debates.&nbsp; Debates also allow the voters to see the challenger and incumbent at the same level, and take some of the sheen of inevitability from the incumbent.<br /><br />So, I don't blame Kuhl for waiting to schedule debates, and I understand why Massa is pushing hard to get him to commit to them.&nbsp; <br /><br />What I don't understand is how Kuhl's impoverished campaign is going to get its message out.&nbsp; Part of the reason Kuhl won in 2006 was a last-minute blitz of TV ads in the Rochester market.&nbsp;&nbsp; It doesn't look like he's going to be able to afford that this year.&nbsp; Direct mail is also expensive.&nbsp; And even the Internet costs money -- Randy doesn't even have his <a href="http://kuhlforcongress.com/">campaign website</a> up yet.<br /><br />Unlike expensive for-pay media, debates only cost the gas money, and they're usually well-covered by the press.&nbsp; For that reason alone, I'm wondering if we'll see the Kuhl campaign decide to attend a few more this time around.<br />    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[The Messenger-Post's <a href="http://www.mpnnow.com/opinions/x1319853249">latest editorial</a> says that the "ball is in Kuhl's court" on debates between the two candidates.&nbsp; Kuhl's reasons for waiting to schedule debates are his need to gather petition signatures and the possibility of having a primary opponent. <br /><br />The real reason, which is true in almost every campaign, is that the incumbent has more to lose than the challenger in debates.&nbsp; Debates also allow the voters to see the challenger and incumbent at the same level, and take some of the sheen of inevitability from the incumbent.<br /><br />So, I don't blame Kuhl for waiting to schedule debates, and I understand why Massa is pushing hard to get him to commit to them.&nbsp; <br /><br />What I don't understand is how Kuhl's impoverished campaign is going to get its message out.&nbsp; Part of the reason Kuhl won in 2006 was a last-minute blitz of TV ads in the Rochester market.&nbsp;&nbsp; It doesn't look like he's going to be able to afford that this year.&nbsp; Direct mail is also expensive.&nbsp; And even the Internet costs money -- Randy doesn't even have his <a href="http://kuhlforcongress.com/">campaign website</a> up yet.<br /><br />Unlike expensive for-pay media, debates only cost the gas money, and they're usually well-covered by the press.&nbsp; For that reason alone, I'm wondering if we'll see the Kuhl campaign decide to attend a few more this time around.<br />    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
