<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/an-uncomfortable-fact-about-ga.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4752/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4752/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-04-23T07:30:17-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>An Uncomfortable Fact About Gas</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/an-uncomfortable-fact-about-ga.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/an-uncomfortable-fact-about-ga.html</id>
    <published>2008-04-23T07:30:17-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-23T07:30:17-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Eric Massa and Randy Kuhl are both addressing the issue of higher gas prices.&nbsp; <br /><br />The Kuhl take is the same as the rest of the Republican caucus: it's Nancy Pelosi's fault.&nbsp; If you're interested in the tortured logic by which Kuhl arrives at this view, <a href="http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&amp;id=8519241">here's his floor speech</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp; The sum total of Kuhl's "argument", which is <a href="http://www.gop.gov/c/portal/layout?p_l_id=PUB.1.110&amp;p_p_id=56_INSTANCE_CcMB&amp;p_p_action=0&amp;p_p_state=normal&amp;p_p_col_id=column-2&amp;p_p_col_pos=0&amp;p_p_col_count=2&amp;_56_INSTANCE_CcMB_groupId=1&amp;_56_INSTANCE_CcMB_articleId=1552&amp;_56_INSTANCE_CcMB_version=1.0">cribbed from his caucus</a>, is that Pelosi said that Democrats would lower gas prices and they haven't.&nbsp; Ergo, it's all Pelosi's fault.&nbsp; I don't think anyone's buying:&nbsp; unless the use of botox somehow depletes the world's oil supply, Nancy is in the clear.<br /><br />Massa's view is as follows:<br /><br /><blockquote> The source of this problem is clear - Randy Kuhl and far too many Washington insiders have allowed Big Oil to gouge us at the pump. To solve this problem, we must stop the George W. Bush Big Oil handouts and start investing in real energy independence for America, not real obnoxious profits for Exxon Mobil.<br /></blockquote>I agree with Massa that the subsidies and tax breaks for big oil make no sense, especially when oil is over $100/barrel, and they should be ended at once.<br /><br />But here's the unpleasant fact:&nbsp; the only thing that causes us to stop using so much gasoline, and to invest in energy independence, is high gas prices.&nbsp; For the first time since 1991, and the eighth time since 1951, <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/105/story/585815.html">gas consumption is down</a> in the United States.<br /><br /><blockquote>"Sustained higher gasoline prices are beginning to show up in lower
gasoline consumption,” said Tancred Lidderdale, an analyst for the
Energy Information Administration.<br /></blockquote>While I agree with Massa that, in theory, the government could implement an energy independence program, it's too late for that.&nbsp; We're like the fat smoker who just had a heart attack.&nbsp; We've known for decades what we're supposed to do, but we will only do it under influence of tremendous pain and fear. <br />    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[Eric Massa and Randy Kuhl are both addressing the issue of higher gas prices.&nbsp; <br /><br />The Kuhl take is the same as the rest of the Republican caucus: it's Nancy Pelosi's fault.&nbsp; If you're interested in the tortured logic by which Kuhl arrives at this view, <a href="http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&amp;id=8519241">here's his floor speech</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp; The sum total of Kuhl's "argument", which is <a href="http://www.gop.gov/c/portal/layout?p_l_id=PUB.1.110&amp;p_p_id=56_INSTANCE_CcMB&amp;p_p_action=0&amp;p_p_state=normal&amp;p_p_col_id=column-2&amp;p_p_col_pos=0&amp;p_p_col_count=2&amp;_56_INSTANCE_CcMB_groupId=1&amp;_56_INSTANCE_CcMB_articleId=1552&amp;_56_INSTANCE_CcMB_version=1.0">cribbed from his caucus</a>, is that Pelosi said that Democrats would lower gas prices and they haven't.&nbsp; Ergo, it's all Pelosi's fault.&nbsp; I don't think anyone's buying:&nbsp; unless the use of botox somehow depletes the world's oil supply, Nancy is in the clear.<br /><br />Massa's view is as follows:<br /><br /><blockquote> The source of this problem is clear - Randy Kuhl and far too many Washington insiders have allowed Big Oil to gouge us at the pump. To solve this problem, we must stop the George W. Bush Big Oil handouts and start investing in real energy independence for America, not real obnoxious profits for Exxon Mobil.<br /></blockquote>I agree with Massa that the subsidies and tax breaks for big oil make no sense, especially when oil is over $100/barrel, and they should be ended at once.<br /><br />But here's the unpleasant fact:&nbsp; the only thing that causes us to stop using so much gasoline, and to invest in energy independence, is high gas prices.&nbsp; For the first time since 1991, and the eighth time since 1951, <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/105/story/585815.html">gas consumption is down</a> in the United States.<br /><br /><blockquote>"Sustained higher gasoline prices are beginning to show up in lower
gasoline consumption,” said Tancred Lidderdale, an analyst for the
Energy Information Administration.<br /></blockquote>While I agree with Massa that, in theory, the government could implement an energy independence program, it's too late for that.&nbsp; We're like the fat smoker who just had a heart attack.&nbsp; We've known for decades what we're supposed to do, but we will only do it under influence of tremendous pain and fear. <br />    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
