<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/farm-bill-and-ethanol.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4757/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4757/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-04-27T14:08:41-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Farm Bill and Ethanol</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/farm-bill-and-ethanol.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/04/farm-bill-and-ethanol.html</id>
    <published>2008-04-27T14:08:41-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-27T14:08:41-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="News" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today's Corning Leader has
a <a href="http://www.the-leader.com/news/x317103435">story on the
Farm Bill</a>, which is still crawling through Congress.  The bill
includes $1.6 billion in specialty crop funding, which will help the
area's apple and grape growers.</p>

<p>The bill still includs $5.2 billion of "direct payments" to farmers,
who are making record profits due to high food prices that are <a href="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11050146">causing
widespread malnutrition</a> in developing countries. 
</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/26/washington/26farm.html">Times'
article on the bill</a> notes that the ethanol tax credit has been
reduced 6 cents, to 45 cents/gallon.  Though the bill adds incentives
for cellulosic ethanol, the corn ethanol subsidy continues to line the
pockets of agribusiness without contributing to energy independence.
</p>

<p>The ethanol subsidy is an area of government dysfunction where both
the left and right can agree.  Eric Massa
has <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2007/11/massa-on-the-junket.html">spoken
out against</a> corn ethanol in the past.  And even the conservative
National Review <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzUzNmMwOTI5NWMxNzU3ODljODVlOWQ0MGUxMTYwMTk=">thinks we're getting shafted:</a></p>
<blockquote>
But today, liberal environmentalists are not the ones pushing
ethanol. It's Agribusiness, all the way. Most reputable liberals
believe ethanol to be a big joke — an enormous corporate welfare
subsidy with no real benefits and many downsides.  <br /><br /> On many
issues, Conservatives have more in common with ideological liberals
than we do with the business interests that come to Washington looking
for a handout. Our goal should be to persuade the Left — to use clear
failures we agree on, like ethanol — to demonstrate that Big Business
will always come to Washington for handouts until Washington stops
giving them altogether. Each new handout is the next ethanol, the next
sugar — and once you've started giving a handout, it never ends.
</blockquote>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today's Corning Leader has
a <a href="http://www.the-leader.com/news/x317103435">story on the
Farm Bill</a>, which is still crawling through Congress.  The bill
includes $1.6 billion in specialty crop funding, which will help the
area's apple and grape growers.</p>

<p>The bill still includs $5.2 billion of "direct payments" to farmers,
who are making record profits due to high food prices that are <a href="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11050146">causing
widespread malnutrition</a> in developing countries. 
</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/26/washington/26farm.html">Times'
article on the bill</a> notes that the ethanol tax credit has been
reduced 6 cents, to 45 cents/gallon.  Though the bill adds incentives
for cellulosic ethanol, the corn ethanol subsidy continues to line the
pockets of agribusiness without contributing to energy independence.
</p>

<p>The ethanol subsidy is an area of government dysfunction where both
the left and right can agree.  Eric Massa
has <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2007/11/massa-on-the-junket.html">spoken
out against</a> corn ethanol in the past.  And even the conservative
National Review <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzUzNmMwOTI5NWMxNzU3ODljODVlOWQ0MGUxMTYwMTk=">thinks we're getting shafted:</a></p>
<blockquote>
But today, liberal environmentalists are not the ones pushing
ethanol. It's Agribusiness, all the way. Most reputable liberals
believe ethanol to be a big joke — an enormous corporate welfare
subsidy with no real benefits and many downsides.  <br /><br /> On many
issues, Conservatives have more in common with ideological liberals
than we do with the business interests that come to Washington looking
for a handout. Our goal should be to persuade the Left — to use clear
failures we agree on, like ethanol — to demonstrate that Big Business
will always come to Washington for handouts until Washington stops
giving them altogether. Each new handout is the next ethanol, the next
sugar — and once you've started giving a handout, it never ends.
</blockquote>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
