<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/05/gannett-hot-chicks-lower-circu.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4776/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4776/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-05-15T15:38:03-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Gannett - Hot Chicks, Lower Circulation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/05/gannett-hot-chicks-lower-circu.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/05/gannett-hot-chicks-lower-circu.html</id>
    <published>2008-05-15T15:38:03-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-15T15:38:03-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Media" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>City Newspaper, Rochester's so-called "alternative" paper, <a href="http://rochestercitynewspaper.com/news/articles/MEDIA%3A+Guess+they+were+out+of+flowers/">has a story</a> about Gannett's Insider.  For their Mothers' Day edition, the Insider ran a story on "Rochester MILFs".  MILF stands for "Mother I'd Like to Fuck", for anyone who missed American Pie and/or the last decade of American culture.</p>
<p>City makes the obvious point that a newspaper company that rails against gangsta rap and the coarsening of our culture is being just a teensy bit hypocritical when they front-page fuck-worthy single Moms.  City fails to note that a publication from a company that wins diversity awards wasn't able to find a single MoCILF (Mother of Color I'd Like to Fuck) in Rochester.</p>
<p>I would have thought City, which is a bastion of complacent baby-boom liberalism, would want to advocate for MoCILFs.  I guess an "alternative" weekly that is too timid to even print the word "fuck" can't be expected to comment on this obvious omission.</p>
<p>Even though Gannett is getting a little heat on this, expect more of it in the future.  A new reader sent me some historical D&amp;C circulation rates, and they are grim.   The D&amp;C lost almost 10,000 Sunday subscribers in the last year.  I don't know if MILFs can reverse a hemorrhage like that.   Maybe the D&amp;C should start featuring <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_Three_girl">Page Three Girls.</a></p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>City Newspaper, Rochester's so-called "alternative" paper, <a href="http://rochestercitynewspaper.com/news/articles/MEDIA%3A+Guess+they+were+out+of+flowers/">has a story</a> about Gannett's Insider.  For their Mothers' Day edition, the Insider ran a story on "Rochester MILFs".  MILF stands for "Mother I'd Like to Fuck", for anyone who missed American Pie and/or the last decade of American culture.</p>
<p>City makes the obvious point that a newspaper company that rails against gangsta rap and the coarsening of our culture is being just a teensy bit hypocritical when they front-page fuck-worthy single Moms.  City fails to note that a publication from a company that wins diversity awards wasn't able to find a single MoCILF (Mother of Color I'd Like to Fuck) in Rochester.</p>
<p>I would have thought City, which is a bastion of complacent baby-boom liberalism, would want to advocate for MoCILFs.  I guess an "alternative" weekly that is too timid to even print the word "fuck" can't be expected to comment on this obvious omission.</p>
<p>Even though Gannett is getting a little heat on this, expect more of it in the future.  A new reader sent me some historical D&amp;C circulation rates, and they are grim.   The D&amp;C lost almost 10,000 Sunday subscribers in the last year.  I don't know if MILFs can reverse a hemorrhage like that.   Maybe the D&amp;C should start featuring <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_Three_girl">Page Three Girls.</a></p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
