<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/05/amos-massachusetts-earmark.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4782/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4782/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-05-20T13:29:55-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Amo&#039;s Massachusetts Earmark</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/05/amos-massachusetts-earmark.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/05/amos-massachusetts-earmark.html</id>
    <published>2008-05-20T13:29:55-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-20T13:29:55-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="Earmarks" />
    <category term="News" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Reader Paul sends stories from Boston concerning one of Amo Houghton's last earmarks. Houghton, who held the 29th seat for nine terms, is one of the honorary chairs of Randy Kuhl's re-election campaign.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/03/27/ex_congressmans_role_in_water_project_blasted/">Boston Globe story</a> reports that Amo inserted a $50K earmark into a water appropriations bill to study the feasibility of connecting a pond in Massachusetts to a nearby harbor.  The pond happens to cause flooding of nearby properties, one of which is owned by Houghton's wife.  The study earmark was followed by another earmark of $728K by Democrat Bill Delahunt (MA-10), who represents Cohasset.  The Corps of Engineers also budgeted $320K from a discretionary fund for the project.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/general/view.bg?articleid=1083143&amp;srvc=home&amp;position=2">Boston Herald column</a> includes a picture of the property.  A <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/general/view.bg?articleid=1084198&amp;srvc=rss">later Herald piece</a> reports that the town of Cohasset rejected the project.</p>
<p>My impression of Amo Houghton is that he's an honorable man, and I take him at his word when he says that he believes this project is in the best interests of the area.   But the problem with earmarks is that even a well-intentioned, bi-partisan earmark is often bad policy.   Clearly, the Cohasset voters think the project isn't essential.  So it's unlikely that it would have been funded if Amo hadn't been able to use his connections to secure federal funding.</p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Reader Paul sends stories from Boston concerning one of Amo Houghton's last earmarks. Houghton, who held the 29th seat for nine terms, is one of the honorary chairs of Randy Kuhl's re-election campaign.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/03/27/ex_congressmans_role_in_water_project_blasted/">Boston Globe story</a> reports that Amo inserted a $50K earmark into a water appropriations bill to study the feasibility of connecting a pond in Massachusetts to a nearby harbor.  The pond happens to cause flooding of nearby properties, one of which is owned by Houghton's wife.  The study earmark was followed by another earmark of $728K by Democrat Bill Delahunt (MA-10), who represents Cohasset.  The Corps of Engineers also budgeted $320K from a discretionary fund for the project.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/general/view.bg?articleid=1083143&amp;srvc=home&amp;position=2">Boston Herald column</a> includes a picture of the property.  A <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/general/view.bg?articleid=1084198&amp;srvc=rss">later Herald piece</a> reports that the town of Cohasset rejected the project.</p>
<p>My impression of Amo Houghton is that he's an honorable man, and I take him at his word when he says that he believes this project is in the best interests of the area.   But the problem with earmarks is that even a well-intentioned, bi-partisan earmark is often bad policy.   Clearly, the Cohasset voters think the project isn't essential.  So it's unlikely that it would have been funded if Amo hadn't been able to use his connections to secure federal funding.</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
