<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/06/kuhls-questionable-facts.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4807/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4807/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-06-10T07:22:00-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Kuhl&#039;s Context-Free Facts</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/06/kuhls-questionable-facts.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/06/kuhls-questionable-facts.html</id>
    <published>2008-06-10T07:22:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-10T07:22:00-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="News" />
    <category term="WNYCongress" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Randy Kuhl's <a href="http://kuhl.house.gov/blog/index.php/2008/06/09/energy-facts/">latest blog post</a> makes the following claims about ANWR:</p>
<blockquote>
The mean estimate of technically recoverable oil in ANWR is 10.4 billion barrels – all of which is now economically recoverable. 
<ul>
<li>That’s more than twice the proven oil reserves in all of Texas.</li>
<li>That’s almost half of the total U.S. proven reserve of 21 billion barrels.</li>
<li>That represents a possible 50 percent increase in total U.S. proven reserves.</li>
</ul>
 </blockquote>
<p>These facts would make one believe that ANWR could make a huge difference in our current oil supply.  However, let's look at <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN2934033020080429?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0&amp;sp=true">a couple of other facts</a> from the Reuters' article I linked to earlier: </p>
<ul>
<li>US oil consumption is 20.6 million barrels per day, or 7.5 billion barrels per year.</li>
<li>Peak production from ANWR would be 780,000 barrels per day.  But that couldn't be accomplished until 2020, when it will be 2% of our daily oil consumption, assuming a steady increase in oil use.   Even assuming zero growth, ANWR's peak flow is less than 4% of our current daily consumption.</li>
</ul>
<p>Whatever your position on drilling in ANWR, it isn't a magic bullet, especially when you put Kuhl's raw numbers in context.</p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Randy Kuhl's <a href="http://kuhl.house.gov/blog/index.php/2008/06/09/energy-facts/">latest blog post</a> makes the following claims about ANWR:</p>
<blockquote>
The mean estimate of technically recoverable oil in ANWR is 10.4 billion barrels – all of which is now economically recoverable. 
<ul>
<li>That’s more than twice the proven oil reserves in all of Texas.</li>
<li>That’s almost half of the total U.S. proven reserve of 21 billion barrels.</li>
<li>That represents a possible 50 percent increase in total U.S. proven reserves.</li>
</ul>
 </blockquote>
<p>These facts would make one believe that ANWR could make a huge difference in our current oil supply.  However, let's look at <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN2934033020080429?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0&amp;sp=true">a couple of other facts</a> from the Reuters' article I linked to earlier: </p>
<ul>
<li>US oil consumption is 20.6 million barrels per day, or 7.5 billion barrels per year.</li>
<li>Peak production from ANWR would be 780,000 barrels per day.  But that couldn't be accomplished until 2020, when it will be 2% of our daily oil consumption, assuming a steady increase in oil use.   Even assuming zero growth, ANWR's peak flow is less than 4% of our current daily consumption.</li>
</ul>
<p>Whatever your position on drilling in ANWR, it isn't a magic bullet, especially when you put Kuhl's raw numbers in context.</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
