<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/06/massa-press-conference-2gallon.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4819/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4819/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-06-18T19:12:10-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Massa Press Conference:  $2/gallon Gas?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/06/massa-press-conference-2gallon.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/06/massa-press-conference-2gallon.html</id>
    <published>2008-06-18T19:12:10-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-18T19:12:10-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="News" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today's Massa press conference concentrated on oil, and <a href="http://kuhl.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=94423">Randy
  Kuhl's plan for $2/gallon gas</a>.</p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today's Massa press conference concentrated on oil, and <a href="http://kuhl.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=94423">Randy
  Kuhl's plan for $2/gallon gas</a>.</p>

<p>Most of the press conference was a variation on one theme:  what
  was Kuhl thinking?  Massa's response, generally, was "ask
  Kuhl", and then he would dive into the specifics of each
  question.</p>
<p>Massa began with a challenge.  After noting that Kuhl's promise
  would require a "miracle", he said:</p>
<blockquote>
If he wants to promise and guarantee, I'd ask him to put his personal
money on the line, so when this falls through like these empty
promises always do, the people in Corning can turn to him for a
check. [...] It's irresponsible to claim that if we drill in ANWR we
will see an immediate benefit [...]  Ask him waht Santa Claus is
coming down his chimney to make this happen.
</blockquote>
<p>There were a number of reporters on the call (Rob Montana from the
  Hornell Evening Tribune, Rick Miller of the Olean Times-Herald, Bob
  Recotta of the Corning Leader, and Brian Somebody from WLEA).  A
  couple of them asked variations on one question:  A majority of
  Americans support offshore drilling and drilling in ANWR.  What was
  Massa's take?</p>
<p>Massa began by agreeing with John McCain.  He thinks that the
  states with oil off their coasts should have the right to allow
  drilling off their coasts.  He noted that two Republican governors,
  Florida's Jeb Bush and California's Arnold Schwarzenegger, have
  opposed drilling off of their coasts.</p>
<p>Massa added a second point on coastal drilling:  "I don't want a
  penny of profit to pay for the CEO of Exxon's $400 million golden
  parachute."  He says that any profits from drilling offshore should
  go to "creating an entirely new future for us".  Specifically, he
  mentioned that we should "take the profits and put a hybrid in the
  garage of every middle-class family in America."</p>
<p>One reporter asked if this was a reversal of his position on ANWR.
  Massa pointed out that John McCain had previously opposed drilling
  in ANWR, and that Massa still opposes it.</p>
<p>Massa also clarified his position on oil company profits, saying
  that he thought the companies could make 2-3% on drilling offshore,
  not their current level of profit, which he described as
  "gouging".</p>
<p>When asked why he thinks that a majority of Americans (over 60%)
  favor drilling, Massa said it was because "people want a solution." 
</p><p>He added:</p>
<blockquote>
As long as the dollar is worth half what it was two years ago, the
price of petroleum is not going to go down.  You cannot drill your way
out of this problem.  It will take 8 years to get those wellheads into
production.
<br /><br />[...]
<br /><br />
The problem is old Washington just wants to do business as normal.
It's like a broken record, thinking we can drill our way out of this
problem.  Pretty soon, we'll drill off California, and those oil
fields will be gone.  In New York State, Pennsylvania, West Texas,
Southern California, over and over again we see oil fields depleted
and abandoned.  We have one more shot to get this right.
</blockquote>
<p>I asked Massa about shale, which was mentioned in Kuhl's press
  release:</p>
<blockquote>
I have no dobut that we have a number of carbon-based possibilities in
the future.  They are not renewable, have a finite timeline for
impact, don't address the reality of global climate change, and they
don't change the playing field.  We need a whole new ballgame --
all we're getting is more of the same.  If your oil policy is being
driven by Exxon-Mobil, the only people that will benefit are
Exxon-Mobil.
</blockquote>
<p>Massa will be making a more detailed announcement of his energy strategy at the grand opening of his Corning campaign office on Friday.</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
