<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/07/blog-intimidation.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4859/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4859/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-07-15T10:48:23-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Blog Intimidation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/07/blog-intimidation.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/07/blog-intimidation.html</id>
    <published>2008-07-15T10:48:23-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-15T10:48:23-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Media" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.r8ny.com">Room 8</a>, which covers New York City and surrounding region politics, was recently the target of what sounds like gross prosecutorial misconduct.  They were <a href="http://www.r8ny.com/blog/admin/room_eight_fights_bronx_subpoena_wins.html">served a criminal subpoena</a> by the Bronx District Attorney, who wanted to know the identity of one of their anonymous bloggers and commenters,  "Republican Dissident".   The subpoena was accompanied by a gag order, so the facts of the case were hidden from public view until today.</p>
<p>Luckily, Room 8 was able to get free legal counsel from <a href="http://www.citizen.org/litigation/">Public Citizen</a>, and, as the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/technology/15law.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">tells it</a>, that solved the problem:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The district attorney eventually withdrew the subpoena and lifted the gag requirement after the bloggers threatened to sue. But the fact that the tactic was used at all raised alarm bells for some free speech advocates.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As blogs grow in influence, we'll probably see more of this type of legal harassment from those who have the resources to launch a suit.  It deserves the attention of anyone who thinks that free speech is important.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.r8ny.com">Room 8</a>, which covers New York City and surrounding region politics, was recently the target of what sounds like gross prosecutorial misconduct.  They were <a href="http://www.r8ny.com/blog/admin/room_eight_fights_bronx_subpoena_wins.html">served a criminal subpoena</a> by the Bronx District Attorney, who wanted to know the identity of one of their anonymous bloggers and commenters,  "Republican Dissident".   The subpoena was accompanied by a gag order, so the facts of the case were hidden from public view until today.</p>
<p>Luckily, Room 8 was able to get free legal counsel from <a href="http://www.citizen.org/litigation/">Public Citizen</a>, and, as the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/technology/15law.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">tells it</a>, that solved the problem:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The district attorney eventually withdrew the subpoena and lifted the gag requirement after the bloggers threatened to sue. But the fact that the tactic was used at all raised alarm bells for some free speech advocates.
</p></blockquote>
<p>As blogs grow in influence, we'll probably see more of this type of legal harassment from those who have the resources to launch a suit.  It deserves the attention of anyone who thinks that free speech is important.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
