<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/07/hard-money.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4864/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/4864/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-07-16T16:16:09-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Hard Money</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/07/hard-money.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/07/hard-money.html</id>
    <published>2008-07-16T16:16:09-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-16T16:16:09-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <category term="Money" />
    <category term="News" />
    <category term="WNYCongress" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Messenger-Post's <a href="http://www.mpnnow.com/news/x379989913/-Toss-up-race-reflected-in-candidates-cash">money story</a> gets it about right:  this is a close race.  I've looked through the <a href="http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00411306/351386/">Massa</a> and <a href="http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00388173/351909/">Kuhl</a> fundraising reports, and both reflect tough realities for each candidate.</p>
<p>Massa's hard reality is that his nut is much bigger than Kuhl's.  He is running two fully-staffed campaign offices, and his payroll is bigger than Kuhl's.   One of the many benefits of incumbency is that Kuhl can have a presence throughout the district without spending a penny.  Massa doesn't have that luxury, and he spent $120K more than Kuhl this cycle, mainly on office expenses.</p>
<p>Kuhl's burden is that PACs aren't going to cut it.  Last cycle, he got twice as much money from PACs as he did from individuals.  This quarter, those numbers were almost even.    At this point in 2006, he had almost $100K more in PAC money than he did at the end of June.   </p>
<p>Kuhl is almost even with where he was last cycle, and he's had to make up the PAC shortfall by soliciting big-money donors in the district.   Though his effort there is impressive, he doesn't seem to be able to match Massa's volume of small-money donors.  This quarter, 30% of Massa's donors gave less than $250, versus 15% of Kuhl's.    Massa gets a number of contributions via ActBlue, a clearinghouse for Democrats who want to give to a number of different candidates.  </p>
<p>Overall, Kuhl is almost exactly where he was in 2006.  Massa has raised almost three times what he did in 2006.  If the trend continues, Massa will surpass his $3 million goal, which is double what Kuhl raised in 2006.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Messenger-Post's <a href="http://www.mpnnow.com/news/x379989913/-Toss-up-race-reflected-in-candidates-cash">money story</a> gets it about right:  this is a close race.  I've looked through the <a href="http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00411306/351386/">Massa</a> and <a href="http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00388173/351909/">Kuhl</a> fundraising reports, and both reflect tough realities for each candidate.</p>
<p>Massa's hard reality is that his nut is much bigger than Kuhl's.  He is running two fully-staffed campaign offices, and his payroll is bigger than Kuhl's.   One of the many benefits of incumbency is that Kuhl can have a presence throughout the district without spending a penny.  Massa doesn't have that luxury, and he spent $120K more than Kuhl this cycle, mainly on office expenses.</p>
<p>Kuhl's burden is that PACs aren't going to cut it.  Last cycle, he got twice as much money from PACs as he did from individuals.  This quarter, those numbers were almost even.    At this point in 2006, he had almost $100K more in PAC money than he did at the end of June.   </p>
<p>Kuhl is almost even with where he was last cycle, and he's had to make up the PAC shortfall by soliciting big-money donors in the district.   Though his effort there is impressive, he doesn't seem to be able to match Massa's volume of small-money donors.  This quarter, 30% of Massa's donors gave less than $250, versus 15% of Kuhl's.    Massa gets a number of contributions via ActBlue, a clearinghouse for Democrats who want to give to a number of different candidates.  </p>
<p>Overall, Kuhl is almost exactly where he was in 2006.  Massa has raised almost three times what he did in 2006.  If the trend continues, Massa will surpass his $3 million goal, which is double what Kuhl raised in 2006.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
