<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/10/pelosi-derangement-syndrome.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/5049/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/5049/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-10-08T16:22:22-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Pelosi Derangement Syndrome</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/10/pelosi-derangement-syndrome.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/10/pelosi-derangement-syndrome.html</id>
    <published>2008-10-08T16:22:22-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-10-08T16:22:22-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Ads" />
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Massa campaign has issued a press release about <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/10/new-kuhl-ad-massa-tax-plan.html">Randy Kuhl's latest ad</a>.   The release points out that the "Pelosi tax plan" that Kuhl accuses Massa of supporting is actually a non-binding resolution, that Massa isn't in Congress, and, besides, Massa <a href="http://massaforcongress.com/eric_massa_tax_plan.pdf">has his own tax plan [pdf]</a>.</p>
<p>All true, but here's my question:  When did Nancy Pelosi become universally despised?   Or, put another way:  If Massa had produced a similar ad in 2006, would he have put a picture of Denny Hastert and Randy Kuhl in it?</p>
<p>Perhaps it's a failure of my imagination, or a reflection of my biases, but I don't think that the undecided, low-information voters who are the target of last-minute campaign ads are going to see Nancy with Eric and reach for the smelling salts.</p>
<p>In addition to power of the she-devil Pelosi, Kuhl's counting on that old warhorse -- "He'll raise your taxes" -- to carry him through one more battle.   I'm skeptical.   We're funding an endless war, rescuing banks, and we've just nationalized an insurance company.  Isn't it obvious that taxes will go up?  </p>
<p>Democrats are saying that the top 5% will bear the burden of the increase.   I think that's salable in this environment.  Kuhl's implied claim that he won't raise taxes just flies in the face of economic reality.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Massa campaign has issued a press release about <a href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2008/10/new-kuhl-ad-massa-tax-plan.html">Randy Kuhl's latest ad</a>.   The release points out that the "Pelosi tax plan" that Kuhl accuses Massa of supporting is actually a non-binding resolution, that Massa isn't in Congress, and, besides, Massa <a href="http://massaforcongress.com/eric_massa_tax_plan.pdf">has his own tax plan [pdf]</a>.</p>
<p>All true, but here's my question:  When did Nancy Pelosi become universally despised?   Or, put another way:  If Massa had produced a similar ad in 2006, would he have put a picture of Denny Hastert and Randy Kuhl in it?</p>
<p>Perhaps it's a failure of my imagination, or a reflection of my biases, but I don't think that the undecided, low-information voters who are the target of last-minute campaign ads are going to see Nancy with Eric and reach for the smelling salts.</p>
<p>In addition to power of the she-devil Pelosi, Kuhl's counting on that old warhorse -- "He'll raise your taxes" -- to carry him through one more battle.   I'm skeptical.   We're funding an endless war, rescuing banks, and we've just nationalized an insurance company.  Isn't it obvious that taxes will go up?  </p>
<p>Democrats are saying that the top 5% will bear the burden of the increase.   I think that's salable in this environment.  Kuhl's implied claim that he won't raise taxes just flies in the face of economic reality.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
