<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Fighting 29th</title>
  <subtitle>All about New York's 29th Congressional District</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2009/04/bandwidth-cheap.html"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/node/5562/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/node/5562/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2009-04-05T21:29:14-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Bandwidth is Cheap</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fighting29th.com/2009/04/bandwidth-cheap.html" />
    <id>http://www.fighting29th.com/2009/04/bandwidth-cheap.html</id>
    <published>2009-04-05T10:40:51-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-04-05T21:29:14-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rottenchester</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Analysis" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/the-cost-to-offer-the-worlds-fastest-broadband-20-per-home/">has a story</a> on how incredibly cheap it is for cable companies to upgrade their Internet infrastructure.  For $20/home, a Japanese cable company was able to upgrade its network to provide access that's 16 times faster than Time-Warner's.  That service costs $60/month in Japan, and it isn't capped.  In Rochester, Time-Warner wants to charge almost that much ($55/month) for usage-capped, slower service.</p>
<p>The Times also mentions a rival Verizon service, FiOS.  This is a fiber-optic service that runs 5 times faster than Time-Warner's.  Unfortunately, in Rochester and probably most of the 29th district, we won't see this service.  That's because Frontier, not Verizon, is <s>our</s> Rochester's local phone company.  Frontier's capital budget has been gutted by multiple acquisitions, and they have no plans to upgrade their copper infrastructure to fiber. </p>
<p>Time-Warner is only rolling out usage caps in markets where FiOS doesn't compete.  Because the 29th is one of those markets, we're going to be at a distinct technological disadvantage compared to other areas that have real Internet competition.  The economic development of Rochester and the entire region could be stunted by the Time-Warner/Frontier duopoly.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/the-cost-to-offer-the-worlds-fastest-broadband-20-per-home/">has a story</a> on how incredibly cheap it is for cable companies to upgrade their Internet infrastructure.  For $20/home, a Japanese cable company was able to upgrade its network to provide access that's 16 times faster than Time-Warner's.  That service costs $60/month in Japan, and it isn't capped.  In Rochester, Time-Warner wants to charge almost that much ($55/month) for usage-capped, slower service.</p>
<p>The Times also mentions a rival Verizon service, FiOS.  This is a fiber-optic service that runs 5 times faster than Time-Warner's.  Unfortunately, in Rochester and probably most of the 29th district, we won't see this service.  That's because Frontier, not Verizon, is <s>our</s> Rochester's local phone company.  Frontier's capital budget has been gutted by multiple acquisitions, and they have no plans to upgrade their copper infrastructure to fiber. </p>
<p>Time-Warner is only rolling out usage caps in markets where FiOS doesn't compete.  Because the 29th is one of those markets, we're going to be at a distinct technological disadvantage compared to other areas that have real Internet competition.  The economic development of Rochester and the entire region could be stunted by the Time-Warner/Frontier duopoly.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
