The Company Massa Keeps

In a piece about Amo Houghton's endorsement in the City News Blog, reporter Krestia DeGeorge mentions a Kuhl press release about Massa's fundraiser with "Liberal Tax and Spend" Nancy Pelosi in New York City.  DeGeorge wonders if a NYC fundraiser with Pelosi is smart, given the Kuhl campaign's attempt to paint Massa as an "outsider".

My take is that the Pelosi fundraiser will have less detrimental effect to the Massa campaign than the Vice-President's visit last month.  Like Cheney, Pelosi mainly attracts the ire of base voters who would never consider switching tickets.  Unlike the Cheney visit, Pelosi is less well-known figure, she's less widely disliked, and her fundraiser in NYC didn't make the Rochester news.

It's worth nothing that Kuhl made no similar fuss when Massa went to New York in August to participate in a fundraiser with Jack Murtha, and Massa didn't make a peep when Republican Majority Leader John Boehner raised funds in Horseheads that same month.  Massa raised a ruckus about Cheney because he wanted to keep Iraq front and center.  Similary, Kuhl's complaint is tied to his campaign's seemingly single-minded focus on Massa's alleged desire to raise taxes.

Kuhl's press release repeats a claim similar to one he made in the debates, that Massa

will raise taxes with the very first bill he cosponsors, the socialized medicine bill to raise taxes at least $24,000 on the average family in the 29th District.

That $24,000 figure is derived by dividing the total cost of healthcare in the United States by the number of families and calling that number a "tax".   Of course, that number doesn't take into account the current cost of health insurance.  That cost would disappear under single-payer health care ("socialized medicine").   The cost of single-payer is up in the air, but one thing is certain:  it will not cost every family 24,000 additional dollars, or anything close to that number.

This is another walk on the stupid side, and what's galling to me is that there's no need for Kuhl to do it.  There are so many other, more reasonable arguments to be made against single-payer health care.  But today's talking point is taxes, and everything has to be hammered into that mold.

Regular readers might notice that I don't generally link to or discuss press releases.  That's for two reasons.  First, most press releases are full of bullshit, no matter who issues them.  Second, there's usually an elephant in the room that goes unmentioned.  In this case, it's the House leadership.  Randy Kuhl wouldn't attend a fundraiser with Denny Hastert in Timbuktu or Alpha Ceti 7, not to mention New York City.  The very fact that Massa is willing to fundraise with his party's leadership is the story Kuhl's press release, and City News, ignores.

Comments

Idiocy, pure idiocy. No one knows who Pelosi is except partisans. It won't affect swing voters.

I guess this started to dawn on me around the 25th time I read an analysis of it.

Why are reporters so fricking dumb?

I thought this post was inside baseball, but now I'm going to go inside inside baseball...

I agree with you that Van Wicklin's presser is idiotic.

But is the reporter dumb? As much as hate missing an opportunity to piss on City News, I think he raised a legit question, namely, is it smart to go to NYC for fundraisers if you're being called a carpetbagger?

I agree with you that Pelosi is not a swing-voter issue, but the question's worth asking.

Also, the press release and comment about "outsider" was sort of an afterthought - he was mainly focusing on the Houghton ad. I had a little email back and forth with him a couple of days ago, and he seems like an intelligent and reasonable person.

So, my conclusion is he's not an idiot. I did ding him for not reading carefully something he links to, which Lord knows I've done many a time, too. But I don't get paid to do this, so he gets a little more scrutiny than average.

So there's my lukewarm defense of City News. Hopefully a one-time thing.

What irks me is that it is typical by-the-numbers reporting.

Okay, just to clarify -- I agree with the reporter about New York City but not about Nancy Pelosi.

Agree with your last point.

On "by-the-numbers", well, that's why I'm here (and I'm guessing that's why you're doing what you're doing).

On "by-the-numbers", well, that's why I'm here (and I'm guessing that's why you're doing what you're doing).

Yeah, pretty much.