The Fighting 29th

All about New York's 29th Congressional District

Reader Elmer sends today's Corning Leader editorial page [pdf], which includes managing editor Joe Dunning's column. Dunning's topic is the Kuhl/Massa race. He says that Kuhl's reluctance to say that it's time to pull out from Iraq will cost him votes, and that the Petraeus report is an anti-climax.

The Star-Gazette coverage of the protesters' trial in Bath says the trial will resume this morning. There's no indication that Kuhl will testify.

Today's Star-Gazette coverage includes a longer article about today's trial of anti-war protesters in Bath. As expected, Kuhl will not be attending the trial, even though he was issued a subpoena on Wednesday. Channel 10 in Syracuse, and Channel 18 in Elmira also carry short pieces on the subpoena.

According to its work schedule [pdf], Congress will adjourn next Tuesday (9/11) at 3 p.m. and remain in recess for the rest of the week due to Rosh Hashana. So Kuhl could, in theory, testify next week if necessary.

In the Star-Gazette story, Kuhl's spokesperson says that the subpoena will be referred to the House's general counsel. According to Rule 8 of the Rules of the House, Kuhl has a duty to inform the Speaker when in receipt of a subpoena that pertains to the "official functions of the House". I don't know if maintaining his district office falls under that heading. If so, according to Rule 8, it is up to the Member to determine if the subpoena is "is a proper exercise of jurisdiction by the court, is material and relevant, and is consistent with the privileges and rights of the House." Assuming that it is, then the member is directed to comply.

One of the major privileges of the house is contained in the Speech or Debate clause of the Constitution, and is also known as "Congressional Immunity". It forbids the arrest of a Member of Congress for crimes other than "Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace" while Congress is in session or while the Member travels to or from Congress. I doubt that this clause will have any bearing on a subpoena from a court in Bath, but any legal action involving a Member of Congress engaged in his official duties opens an interesting can of worms.

The phrase "tilting at windmills" is often used metaphorically, but in today's press conference, Eric Massa did it literally. Read on for more about wind power and other issues.

Massa began today's conference with a discussion of S-CHIP, which, he said, is "a very easy-to-understand effort by the new Congress to increase access to quality health care for the nation's uninsured children." Massa called Kuhl's vote against S-CHIP "stunning": "Especially in the rural areas of the 29th Congressional District, we have a real emergency with regard to health care in general, but specifically for children."

Massa stressed his view of the non-partisan nature of S-CHIP:

This is not a Republican or Democratic issue. When I go to the doctor, I don't say 'Are you a Republican or a Democrat?' Medical care should have nothing to do with partisan politics, but everything to do with access.

Bryan Roth from the Messenger-Post asked why Massa considered health care an "emergency". Massa replied that 49 million Americans don't have health care, and that "as access to health care is cut back, illness and fatalities increase." Roth also asked what Massa thinks needs to be done. Massa's response:

I'm on record supporting single-payer health care: privately-delivered publicly-funded health care. I will work to give the American People what Congress has given itself. Every Member of Congress has a gold-plated, diamond-studded health plan. The American people deserve no less. [If I am elected,] I will not accept the Congressional Health Plan. As a military retiree, I'll stay on that program, which is far less than Congress', until everyone in the 29th Congressional District has the same as what Congress gives itself.

I asked Massa what he thought about the objection that the new S-CHIP limits in New York were too high, since they covered a family of 4 with an income of $80,000 (actually, I was wrong: it's $82,500). Massa said that "a family of 4 earning $80,000 is certainly eligible to pay for the Iraq war." He added:

Why is it wrong for someone with an $80,000 income to get access, while it's OK for Congress to get free access to health care. It comes down to a bottom-line discussion item: why should health care come down to a competitive model: survival of the fittest. We're the only industrialized country [doing that].

With S-CHIP out of the way, Massa turned to wind power. He prefaced his windmill discussion with a discussion of the way that nuclear energy was marketed in the 1950's. Massa remembers advertising which featured "clean free nuclear energy" but didn't mention "the hundreds of billions of dollars for cleanup, the long-term health risks, or the increases in taxes." Massa sees the same thing happening in current talk about windmills:

Today in Steuben County and throughout the Southern Tier, we are being scammed in much the same way. We are scammed by foreign-owned companies building foreign-manufactured wind turbines that will not produce electricity. This is a threat to landowners, who will see taxes explode. It is an environmental burden, which will see bird populations destroyed. Foreign companies will take their tax subsidies and run, with no money going to the 29th Congressional District. We are going to have to live with 1,000 windmills the size of the Washington Monument.

Massa said he was interested in this issue because "our local governments are not sounding the alarm". I asked him why he thought that the windmills wouldn't produce energy:

We are being told that we are building windmills to provide electrical power for New York State's largest consumers. The largest consumers in New York are air conditioners in New York City. Wind is available for generation in upstate on cold winter nights. That's when there's enough wind to turn 450 foot towers.

Finally, on Iraq, Massa had this to say about the Petraeus report:

We're seeing something in this administration that we've never seen before in the history of the United States of America. We're seeing a Commander-in-Chief and Members of Congress saying that they're going to wait until they get a report from a General [to decide what to do about the war]. George W. Bush is the Commander-in-Chief. He's supposed to be the leader, not the follower. Members of Congress are elected to lead, not follow. In the American military tradition, it's the civilians who tell the military leaders what to do, not the other way around.

Every time I read a story about the dire state of Monroe County, or think about the 2008 election, I get really, really angry at the group that's supposed to be filling the role of the loyal opposition in my home county: the Monroe County Democratic Committee (MCDC). Part of the reason has to do with my experiences working for a Democratic party that worked hard to fulfill their role as the loyal opposition. If you have nothing better to do on Labor Day, you might be interested my political history and how it relates to the current state of the MCDC.

I grew up in the reddest part of a red state: R + ∞ on the Cook scale. When I was growing up, my Dad was occasionally the County Democratic Party Chair. Now this was a tiny county, so his position was anything but an honor, and the work was mundane. In addition to organizing the work of others, Dad did things like helping canvass, distributing yard signs, and -- most importantly -- recruiting candidates.

Now the candidates that Dad recruited almost invariably lost. So he had to work hard to cajole some poor soul into spending his or her time and money to run for whatever piddling little office was up for election. Once in a long while, the Republican running against the Democratic sacrificial lamb would lose, mainly because the GOP candidate was widely recognized as a gross incompetent. Those were days to celebrate.

But victory celebrations were few and far between, so election day wasn't usually a hell of a lot of fun. No matter: in the weeks before the election, Dad would be on the phone coordinating poll workers and telephone callers. The day of the election, Dad and the rest of his motley crew would provide rides to the polls and stay up late waiting for results.

Though he's 76 and retired from work and party leadership, my old man is still volunteering. Recently, he was out canvassing in a bad part of town and some daytime drinkers offered him a party and perhaps a blow job if he played his cards right. Since he's not a Republican US Senator, Dad didn't know what to make of that offer, so he politely turned it down and went to knock on the next door. If you want to find him on election day, look for the guy giving the old ladies a ride to the polls and turning down unsolicited bjs.

A lot of what I know about practical politics was learned from my old man and his Democratic buddies. As I went through High School and came home from College, I'd give Dad a hand in his quixotic tasks. I was even a delegate to the State Democratic Convention one summer when I was 19 years old. (As you might imagine, Dad couldn't get some other poor idiot to do the job.) So I've seen a grassroots, hard-working group of Democrats fighting against bad odds to eke out the occasional victory.

When I moved to New York a few years ago, I figured that my days of watching a pathetic Democratic party struggle in vain were over. Surely a town with a solidly Democratic urban core would be running full slates with lots of winners. Even my poor Dad, who had no money and little time, was usually able to get a full slate of candidates, even though most of them went down in flames.

For the first couple of years, my New York state of mind was blissful ignorance. When I pulled the lever for a Democrat, they usually won. Louise Slaughter, my representative back then, would poll 70/30 without breaking a sweat. I'd never seen that before, and, man, did it feel good.

"These Democrats out here are living the dream," I thought to myself. "They don't need to run the risk of unsolicited bjs from toothless drunks. This is how it's supposed to be."

Though I noticed that Democrats never seemed to run in uptight Republican Pittsford, my first real wake-up call was when I got gerrymandered into the 29th district. After Amo Houghton retired, I figured we'd get a strong Democrat to run for the open seat, and that person would campaign hard and have a good chance to win. Hell, even the shitkickers in my home state could field a good candidate for important offices like United States Representative.

Suffice it to say that Sam Barend, a poor candidate who ran a crummy campaign, shattered some of my illusions about the Democrats out here. The lack of support from the rest of the party was even more surprising to me. Where was Louise? I didn't get a letter or call from my former Congresswoman, telling me how great Sam Barend was and why I should vote for her. Where was the MCDC? I didn't get a single get-out-the-vote call. Nobody checked to see if I was old and needed a ride to the polls.

The Monroe County Democratic Party spends more money on catered lunches than the yearly budget of my hometown Democrats. But, for some reason, the get-out-the-vote (GOTV) effort of that bunch of rural yahoos trumps Smugtown's best. One example: the first time anyone has ever asked me if I needed an absentee ballot was last election, after Hillary Clinton's campaign paid the MCDC to get off their leaden asses and run a half-hearted GOTV effort.

The last straw was this year's Monroe County Executive race. They couldn't even field a candidate. This makes Baby Jesus cry. The most important office in the county, and no candidate. I don't know Joe Morelle from the man in the moon, but I can assert without fear of contradiction that he's incompetent, lazy or both.

I don't self-identify as a progressive. I don't go to protests, because I don't like the impatience or absolutism I see there. I'm one of those awful centrists, a compromiser or worse. So why is it that I'm the radical on the topic of the MCDC's fuckups? When I say that Morelle ought to be canned, today or sooner, the same group of progressives who think I'm wishy-washy a little too conservative tells me to be more patient, to wait until after the election. Things, they say, will work themselves out.

Bullshit, I say. The MCDC has been doing a crap job for long enough. Their latest fiasco with the County Exec position probably cost every county leg candidate a good percentage of their votes. The only thing left in this election is GOTV, which the MCDC does poorly. If you're taking the 2007 election seriously, you've realized that it was mainly lost the minute that the MCDC failed to fill the top of its slate. The next opportunity is 2008, and it's time to change MCDC leadership now. We need to give a new team time to build a winning organization for one of the most important elections in the last quarter century.

The fear that Democrats will do worse by replacing MCDC leadership is similar to the fear of the abuse victim who stays with an abuser out of an inability to imagine a better future. Progressives are supposed to be able to imagine a brighter future. Put that imagination to work and visualize a MCDC with new leadership.